bostorus (bostorus) wrote,

A New Regulatory Framework


Officials said they want rules to eliminate conflicts of interest at credit rating agencies that gave top investment grades to the exotic and ultimately shaky financial instruments that have been a source of market turmoil. The core problem, they said, is that the agencies are paid by companies to help them structure financial instruments, which the agencies then grade.

This is from Obama's team, through the NYT. It is the first time I've heard anyone express anything that would actually attack one of the root causes of our current crisis.

Basically, ratings agencies are paid to give advice on how to get a good rating. If their customers give them money, take their advice, and then do not get an increased rating, then those customers will stop giving the ratings agencies money. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the investment products of most of the clients of the ratings agencies got high ratings. That included a large number of very shaky investments (like the infamous bad loans).

Because these shaky financial instruments had high ratings, people poured their money into them. At some point, they realized the investments were, in fact, quite awful, and that the ratings agencies were not producing useful ratings. Now no one is willing to invest in anything, in large part because they don't trust the ratings agencies.

This is well-known, a major issue, and it is also the very first time I've heard any politician speak up on the matter. Restoring trust in the ratings agencies will be a huge first step to solving our problems. It is way better than shoveling money at banks in the hopes that they will start lending again. Congratulations to the Obama team.
Tags: politics

  • How I'm Voting, 2012

    Before the June primary, someone told me that he habitually printed out a copy of my endorsements and took it to the poll with him. With that kind of…

  • How I'm Voting on Tuesday

    For those of you unfamiliar with the California ballot, it's a monstrosity that takes ages to unravel. This is mostly because we have to vote on many…

  • More Random Politics - 3/5ths Majorities

    You know, it is a good thing that the House doesn't require a 3/5ths majority. Controversial legislation that has a 3/5ths majority in the House…

  • Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.